THE SCIENCE

WHAT WE DO

ALTERNATIVES

GET INVOLVED

THE BADGER CULL

In September 2017, DEFRA announced the continuation and expansion of the killing of thousands of badgers across England. 11 new zones have been confirmed with up to 33,000 badgers scheduled for death in 2017 alone! This means that, by the end of this year, 48,000 badgers will be dead as a result of the cull.

Despite the IEP assessment, parliamentary debates, further scientific reports, and an ever growing opposition, the Government have still allowed the badger culls to continue. And that's not all - by the end of 2017, we estimate that over £50 million will be spent on the culls, with every taxpayer in the UK having no choice but to fund this budget.

At the Badger Trust we have openly opposed the cull since its inception; fighting legal battles, calling for scientific research and supporting groups on the ground.  Our stance has always been clear and remains the following:

  1. Badgers are not to blame: Badgers have been used as a scapegoat and demonised in the media despite the lack of scientific evidence.

  2. The science doesn’t support the culls: Independent experts and the Government’s own research does not support the culls as an effective strategy against bovine TB.

  3. Cattle should be the primary focus: Cattle are the main carriers and transmitters for bovine TB and we feel that the bovine TB strategy should focus more on cattle and less on badgers.

Because badger shouldn't be a bad word.

 

LATEST CAMPAIGN NEWS

 

WHAT IS BOVINE TB?

Bovine tuberculosis or bovine TB (bTB) is a highly contagious and deadly disease caused by the bacteria Mycobacterium bovis (M. bovis). The disease forms in the lymph nodes of effected animals and causes symptoms such as coughing, fever, weight loss, diarrhoea, and eventually death. While highly contagious, the slow rate of onset means the disease can go unnoticed for months and even years while it spreads rapidly to other members of the herd.

THE SCIENCE

There has only been one study commissioned by the Government into the issue of bTB transmission from badgers to cattle. This study took place between 1998 and 2006 and is undeniably the most comprehensive study that exists on bovine TB and badgers. This study was called The Randomised Badger Culling Trial or RBCT. The outcome of the study was clear “…data indicates that badger culling can make no meaningful contribution to cattle TB control in Britain”. You can read the report in full here.

More recently, the Independent Expert Panel appointed by DEFRA assessed the culls as “ineffective and inhumane” and shortly after reporting on the ineffectiveness of controlled  shooting, the IEP was dissolved.  Currently the badger cull has no independent scientific oversight with the government undermining expert advice and scientific research. The science has been grossly misinterpreted by groups in favour of the badger cull while independent experts go unheard. It is very important to distinguish between independent reports, and reports that have been conducted by organisations in order to further their cause giving leeway for bias and misinterpretation of data. All reports that we reference are independently or government conducted.

What we do know from both the government, and independent reports is the following:

  • The Randomised Badger Culling Trail (RBCT) proposes that 5.7% of all bTB outbreaks have been caused by badgers and the target for the cull period is to remove over 70% of badgers across the area.

  • According to the RBCT, on average, around 80% of culled badgers do not have detectable bTB, but this varies according to circumstances.

  • The RBCT suggests that 94.3% of all bovine TB outbreaks come from sources other than badgers although around half originated from a badger-cattle breakdown.

  • Welsh herds are 94% bTb free and bTB is dropping significantly without culling badgers.

  • It is likely that up to 22.8% of badgers killed during the IEP study in 2013 took longer than 5 minutes to die deeming the cull inhumane by IEP standards.

  • DEFRA have not released the public costs of the badger cull in 2016. However taking account of the costs reported for training, monitoring, equipment, policing legal costs and administration for 2013 - 2015 we estimate that at least £30 million has been spent to date to kill just under 15,000 badgers.

  • The cost of the culls exceeds the cost of badger vaccination when it is carried out by volunteers where the training, equipment and vaccine is provided by DEFRA as is the case under the Badger Edge Vaccination scheme.

  • Extending the badger cull into further areas will increase enormously, the cost of the cull for the taxpayer, landowners and animal welfare groups.

  • Over £100M could be spend by 2020 on killing badgers.

Cattle are the true hosts of bovine TB and the primary transmission method of the disease in the UK is cattle to cattle transmission. However, the disease has been reported in both domestic and non-domestic animals including: moles, hares, otters, goats, sheep, horses, pigs, boar, deer, dogs, cats, foxes, mink, badgers, ferrets, rats, primates, llamas, squirrels and more.

WELFARE

Badger Culling has been controversial since the beginning as it hasn’t proved to effectively contribute into fall in TB cases in cattle. The Government’s culling policy ignores the science and runs against opinion of the majority of scientific experts who criticise badger culling as an inhumane, unnecessary and ineffective.

Here are some facts behind the badger culling:​

  • Free shooting has been applied as a killing method as it is the most "cost effective". In fact, this method is also the most questionable and inhumane method of killing badgers as minimum training and supervision is requested from the culling companies. In recent years reports have shown that 7.4%-22.8% of badgers took more than 5 minutes to die.

  • None of the badgers killed during the current trials have been tested for TB, making both healthy and infected animals become targeted. Thus with no data published on how many killed badgers are infected with TB, effectiveness of culling is highly questionable.

  • “perturbation effect” can result in wide spread of TB as survivors of the killed badgers might roam more widely causing spread of TB into new areas. The trial from 2007 concluded that culling badgers: “can make no meaningful contribution to cattle TB control in Britain” (You can find full trial in here)

  • Extending badger culling into new areas: South Devon, North Devon, North Cornwall, West Dorset, and South Herefordshire creates an even greater threat for the badger population in England.

Let's get political.

MYTHBUSTERS

Myth: Badgers are the main source of TB in cattle

Truth: The population of badgers with TB is relatively small. With that being said, only 5.7% of all bTB outbreaks have been the direct result of transmission from badgers to cattle. This equally means that 94.3% of all bTB outbreaks come from alternate sources. Badgers, however, are still the subject of unrelenting culling campaigns that cannot possibly eradicate bTB if they only cause 5.7% of all bTB outbreaks. We believe that 5.7% can be significantly lowered, if not removed altogether by an effective vaccination strategy and testing of badgers. At the Badger Trust we believe that the source of the other 94.3% of outbreaks needs to be the primary focus of DEFRA’s strategy.

Myth: Culling is the most effective way to reduce bTB outbreaks in cattle.

Truth: As already mentioned, only 5.7% of bTB outbreaks in cattle are caused by direct transmission from badgers. Spending 50 million of taxpayer funds to kill mostly healthy badgers cannot possibly eradicate bovine tuberculosis as 80% of the culled badgers do not carry TB. We firmly believe that a vaccination and testing strategy for badgers would have a much better effect and most of that 50 million could go towards an effective strategy against the main causes and transmission of bTB. It has already been shown in Wales that tighter control on cattle movements, regular and thorough testing has shown a drop of 30% in bTB incidents. Similarly, vaccination programmes in humans has led to human TB being largely wiped out. There is no reason a similar strategy could not work for cattle and badgers alike. Currently, Welsh herds are 94% bTB free without culling badgers.

 

Myth: Badgers being culled have TB and are a risk to cattle

Truth: The truth is simple, 80% of the badgers being culled in England and Wales do not carry TB and vaccination programmes can effectively lower the risk and even prevent these badgers from ever carrying TB. The risk to cattle from getting bTB from badgers is already low. Scotland is a great example of this; in the 1980s badgers in Scotland that were victims of traffic accidents were tested for TB. While 1 in 48 tested positive the incidents of bTB in cattle were extremely low and often linked to cattle coming in from England, Wales and Ireland. Despite TB in badgers, the strict testing of cattle and import controls meant that in 2009 Scotland was declared bTB free.

 

Myth: Badgers that carry TB are in pain, suffering, and will lead to a slow and painful death.

Truth: Most badgers that test positive for TB will be latent carriers. This means that they are not suffering any symptoms. They may be infected with TB but do not have the disease and a very small percentage will ever develop symptoms. Any animal that is in pain and suffering should be addressed by a trained veterinary professional.

 

Myth: The Badger Trust cares more about badgers than it does cattle

Truth: The Badger Trust is made up of individuals, volunteers, and staff who are passionate about the welfare of many animals in addition to badgers. While our mission is to protect, conserve, and educate the public about badgers and their habitats we do not wish any harm to come to other species. We understand that farmers have a duty of care to their cattle and are just as passionate about their cattle as we are about badgers. For both the health and safety of cattle and badgers we would like to see a constructive and viable solution to the TB crisis. At the Badger Trust we feel that the government is simply appeasing farmers and not giving them the solution they need and deserve. The science has made it clear that culling is not an effective strategy and that other combinations are more effective. To put it simply bTB is a complex issue with complex answers, there is no one simple solution or the issue of culling (that has happened for decades) would have surely been solved by now. We wish to see a solution that doesn’t appease one cause at the expense of another and that gives long lasting and viable solutions to the bTB crisis with as few cattle and badgers killed as possible.

I am not a statistic.

 

ALTERNATIVES

In recent years it has been proven that badger culling has failed to help decline TB within cattle. Recent reports have shown that there are much more humane and efficient methods of controlling TB than culling.

Frequent Testing on Cattle: 

has been proven by research to be a far more effective method to prevent TB than culling. Professor Matthew Evans, from Queen Mary University of London, stated: “Of the available bovine tuberculosis control strategies, we believe that how frequently cattle are tested and whether or not farms utilise winter housing have the most significant effect on the number of infected cattle...Our modelling provides compelling evidence, for those charged with controlling bovine TB, that investment in increasing the frequency of cattle testing is a far more effective strategy than badger culling.”

 

Badger and Cattle Vaccination: 

It is significantly cheaper than the cost of cull. Vaccination would help to control the spread of TB from cattle to cattle and badger to cattle. As DEFRA states:” vaccination of wild badgers in a naturally infected population results in a statistically significant 73.8% reduction in the incidence of positive results to a badger antibody test for TB.” The recent research from Queens Marry University of London has used mathematical models to show spread of TB between cattle and badgers. Lead author Dr Aristides Moustakas said: “The research suggests that an efficient way to vaccinate badgers might be to follow the spatial pattern of TB infections, for example by identifying the hot-spots where the disease is concentrated.” Ireland and Wales, after many years of badger culling, now place emphasis on vaccination.

 

Diagnostic Tests for Badgers: 

Tests would allow more targeted interventions in a particular area at individual badgers rather than at the wider population and judge how affective vaccination is in a specific area.

 

Rigid Cattle Movements Control:

The movement of cattle is a major transmission route for the spread of bovine TB. A study on the role of cattle movements in bTB spread in France concluded that cattle movements were 'essential in the French bTB dynamics'. The full study can be found here.

Likes won't save my life

 
DONATE

Your donation could be put towards supporting vaccination projects, government lobbying and other essential efforts. Our efforts in these areas have been credited with the cull not being expanded into Derbyshire.

BECOME A SUPPORTER

Becoming a supporter of the Badger Trust means that you are helping us protect badgers 360 days of the year. Our supporters and groups are the backbone of badger protection in this country. 

WRITE TO THE PM

Writing your local MP or the Prime Minister is one of the best ways to keep the cull on their radar. It's easier than ever to write your local politicians. A quick google search should connect you with your local MP.

JOIN WOUNDED BADGER PATROLS

Wounded Badger Patrols run every night through the culling period. They are a perfectly legal activity that monitors public ares for injured or shot badgers.

Badger Trust
Registered charity No. 1111440 | Company Registered in the UK No. 5460677

Privacy | Terms | Copyright 2019 Badger Trust

Website by DESIGNinkd

0